Intro: Years ago, I started reading the book this movie is adapted from because "Lolita" is my favourite novel of all time. I'll be honest, I couldn't finish it -- my English wasn't as good as it is now, and I was struggling big time to follow it -- so when I learned about the movie adaptation, I immediately gave it a go.
Film 2509: "Reading Lolita in Tehran" (2026), directed by Eran Riklis
Watched: From the computer
Language: Italian
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: I tried to watch this film in its original language, but I found the English subtitles too distracting. So I decided to go with the Italian-dubbed version, as it was much easier to follow. I don't regret this decision, although I would usually prefer to watch a movie in its original language.
I have to admit I didn't remember much about the story, so watching "Reading Lolita in Tehran" felt like discovering it for the first time. To be honest, "Lolita" isn't at the centre of the story, as it's just one of the many banned books that this group of women read. It's interesting to see how something I found so accessible when I first decided to read "Lolita" has a completely different meaning and set of implications here: reading this book is dangerous, and these women know it all too well, as the regime has forbidden them, along with the rest of Iran's population, from reading it or even talking about it. Instead, I read "Lolita" while on holiday in Greece.
I enjoyed "Reading Lolita in Tehran". It explores the history and culture of a country I know very little about, and it felt refreshing to consume content that wasn't produced or conceived for a Western audience (or specifically an American one).
It's a very quiet movie in the sense that, although deeply unsettling things happen, tragedy isn't sensationalised. I'd say this is mainly thanks to Golshifteh Farahani's portrayal of the protagonist, Azar Nafisi, the author of the book the film is based on. She's assertive but never loud, and practises a form of quiet, almost understated rebellion, with real-life consequences: she refuses to wear the veil, creates a book club for her students, and discusses forbidden Western literature with them.
Her marriage dynamic also feels quite modern, especially considering this story is set in the 70s: she's on equal footing with her husband, has her own job and career, and fights for what she believes in, risking everything in the process. Compared to the other women's romantic relationships, the contrast couldn't be greater. All in all, "Reading Lolita in Tehran" succeeds in showcasing the struggle, uncertainty, and fear that define this period in Iran's history. I'm no expert on the subject, so I'm judging it solely on what I saw in the film. I wish the story had focused more on the actual discussions of the books the women read. I think the film would have benefited from including more of those conversations, but I understand that, with so many characters, historical events to portray, and the challenge of doing the novel justice, there was a lot to cover. All these elements inevitably compete for screen time. I wouldn't say the movie completely succeeds in delivering a balanced story, but its achievements outweigh its limitations.
Cast: Golshifteh Farahani, Zar Amir Ebrahimi, Mina Kavani, Bahar Beihaghi, Isabella Nefar, Raha Rahbari, Lara Wolf, Arash Marandi, Catayoune Ahmadi, Reza Diako, Shahbaz Noshir.
Box Office: $1,580,815
Worth a watch?: It's not a loud film, and its subject matter might limit its appeal to a wider audience. Still, I'd recommend it. It's well made and focuses on topics we rarely get to see in modern mainstream cinema.
Awards: At the 2024 Rome Film Fest the film was nominated for Best Film in the Progressive Cinema section.
Key word: Iranian Revolution.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi
Watched: From the computer
Language: Italian
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: I tried to watch this film in its original language, but I found the English subtitles too distracting. So I decided to go with the Italian-dubbed version, as it was much easier to follow. I don't regret this decision, although I would usually prefer to watch a movie in its original language.
I have to admit I didn't remember much about the story, so watching "Reading Lolita in Tehran" felt like discovering it for the first time. To be honest, "Lolita" isn't at the centre of the story, as it's just one of the many banned books that this group of women read. It's interesting to see how something I found so accessible when I first decided to read "Lolita" has a completely different meaning and set of implications here: reading this book is dangerous, and these women know it all too well, as the regime has forbidden them, along with the rest of Iran's population, from reading it or even talking about it. Instead, I read "Lolita" while on holiday in Greece.
I enjoyed "Reading Lolita in Tehran". It explores the history and culture of a country I know very little about, and it felt refreshing to consume content that wasn't produced or conceived for a Western audience (or specifically an American one).
It's a very quiet movie in the sense that, although deeply unsettling things happen, tragedy isn't sensationalised. I'd say this is mainly thanks to Golshifteh Farahani's portrayal of the protagonist, Azar Nafisi, the author of the book the film is based on. She's assertive but never loud, and practises a form of quiet, almost understated rebellion, with real-life consequences: she refuses to wear the veil, creates a book club for her students, and discusses forbidden Western literature with them.
Her marriage dynamic also feels quite modern, especially considering this story is set in the 70s: she's on equal footing with her husband, has her own job and career, and fights for what she believes in, risking everything in the process. Compared to the other women's romantic relationships, the contrast couldn't be greater. All in all, "Reading Lolita in Tehran" succeeds in showcasing the struggle, uncertainty, and fear that define this period in Iran's history. I'm no expert on the subject, so I'm judging it solely on what I saw in the film. I wish the story had focused more on the actual discussions of the books the women read. I think the film would have benefited from including more of those conversations, but I understand that, with so many characters, historical events to portray, and the challenge of doing the novel justice, there was a lot to cover. All these elements inevitably compete for screen time. I wouldn't say the movie completely succeeds in delivering a balanced story, but its achievements outweigh its limitations.
Cast: Golshifteh Farahani, Zar Amir Ebrahimi, Mina Kavani, Bahar Beihaghi, Isabella Nefar, Raha Rahbari, Lara Wolf, Arash Marandi, Catayoune Ahmadi, Reza Diako, Shahbaz Noshir.
Box Office: $1,580,815
Worth a watch?: It's not a loud film, and its subject matter might limit its appeal to a wider audience. Still, I'd recommend it. It's well made and focuses on topics we rarely get to see in modern mainstream cinema.
Awards: At the 2024 Rome Film Fest the film was nominated for Best Film in the Progressive Cinema section.
Key word: Iranian Revolution.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi
