Film 2468 - The Running Man

Intro: A month ago I went back to Italy and stayed for three days at my cousin's in Igea Marina. The second night I was there we decided to watch a movie and eat piadina, and this is what the streaming platform could offer in terms of entertainment. Not necessarily what I would have watched otherwise, but one of the best options available anyway.

Film 2468: "The Running Man" (2025), Edgar Wright
Watched: From the TV
Language: Italian
Watched with: Fre, Giamma
Thoughts: I mean, I heard it wasn't good and that it flopped hard at the box office last year (this movie cost $110 million just to produce), but I didn't expect it to be bad, in a way. I love Edgar Wright's previous movies like "Hot Fuzz", "Scott Pilgrim vs. the World", "Last Night in Soho" and especially "Baby Driver", so I was sure he could deliver a decent film. Additionally, this story is an adaptation of a Stephen King novel, so overall this whole "The Running Man" experience seemed to have potential.
Reality is, there's just too much going on here to be enjoyable. The pace is so fast that there's barely any time to process what you've just watched before the story immediately pushes you to the next plot point. And it doesn't help that the screenplay throws so much at you that it's almost impossible to let it all sink in. It's simply overcrowded.
It also doesn't help that this is far too similar to things we've seen before and seen done better: "The Hunger Games" franchise, "1984", "Squid Game", and, more recently, "The Long Walk" (also adapted from a Stephen King novel) immediately come to mind. It's clear that this movie has potential; the idea is there and so is part of the execution, but overall it feels too overcrowded with characters and plot points, resulting in a story that somehow feels both half-baked and overlong. I wonder how it would have worked if this movie had been split into two separate films that actually took the time to tell the story properly, slowing down the pace and allowing us to sit with the characters, what they go through, and how they react to the environment they're immersed in.
Unfortunately that isn't the case, and what we're left with is a fast-paced science-fiction action film that includes dystopian elements while barely addressing the implications of its own themes: social inequality, privacy, voyeurism, and the extent one would go to achieve their goals.
On a personal side note, it's impossible not to notice how Glen Powell's career seems to be losing momentum rather quickly. He's not a bad actor by any means, and he's clearly a perfect fit for a product like this, but I think his recent flops ("The Blue Angels", "How to Make a Killing" and this one) are testament to how willing Hollywood is to bet everything on a new face before they've had the time to prove their value. Again, this isn't a dig at Powell, who does a decent job here, but rather what I consider an interesting example of how quickly things evolve in the world of cinema and how it's becoming harder and rarer to find new actors capable of reaching that A-list status which, back in the day, almost guaranteed box-office success and long-term career stability.
Cast: Glen Powell, William H. Macy, Lee Pace, Michael Cera, Emilia Jones, Daniel Ezra, Jayme Lawson, Katy O'Brian, Sean Hayes, Colman Domingo, Josh Brolin.
Box Office: $69 million
Worth a watch?: It's not so bad that it's unwatchable, but it's definitely not a good movie. Everything happens too fast, there's no time to process any information before we jump to the next scene, and it's overcrowded with characters. There's potential in there and the main idea behind the story is interesting, but the consequences and implications of having to survive on a lethal reality television show aren't fully addressed. Instead, the spectacle overshadows any meaningful commentary on relevant issues, which are only explored at a very surface level.
Awards: /
Key word: Flu medicine.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2467 - The Devil Wears Prada 2

Intro: Boy oh boy, was I scared.

Film 2467: "The Devil Wears Prada 2" (2026), David Frankel
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Debbi, Niamh
Thoughts: I've been saying this since before the movie came out and, now that I've watched it, I can confirm it: we did not need this sequel.
The fact is, the first "The Devil Wears Prada" wasn't perfect, but it has become a cult movie in its own right. It's constantly quoted, it has spawned several memes, its cast is iconic and, of course, it gave us Miranda Priestly. Groundbreaking.
So how can a sequel replicate the same success 20 years later while being its own thing at the same time? It can't. And it's not because it didn't try.
For starters, the whole team is back. The four main characters — now all either Oscar winners or nominees, as the trailer eagerly reminds us — have all reprised their roles, together with the same director and screenwriter. Which is clearly a good place to start. The vibe seems to be similar, the themes seem to mirror the previous ones and the overall experience would suggest that, yes, two decades have passed, but if you enjoyed the first outing, this second one will be just as entertaining and iconic. But it's not.

The thing that annoyed me the most about "The Devil Wears Prada 2" is that everything that was done in the first film has been undone here. Miranda is a softie now, Emily secretly wanted to be Andy's friend all along, Andy leaves the business but then here she is back again, Nigel is still waiting for a promotion and finally gets it. I understand that this screenplay is essentially continuing the previous story in a way that gives closure to most of the arcs previously presented, but it does so in a way that goes against how the first story was told. Everything Miranda stood for is rejected here. She's still mean, don't get me wrong, but her resolution with Nigel was so out of character that it really bothered me. And it's not because the character changed, but because it doesn't feel like real growth. Instead, it feels like a happy ending designed to please the audience. If a person like Miranda wanted to reward one of her collaborators, she would have done it and she would have gotten there herself. She's a smart, intelligent and perceptive woman; she doesn't need Andy, of all people, to point out the obvious to her.
Andy, on the other hand, doesn't have much to do here. She's back to save the sinking ship, she has 20 years of journalistic experience behind her, yet the minute she steps back into Runway, it's like she goes back to her first day of work at the magazine. Why? I understand Miranda is bossy, often intimidating and sometimes scary, but the way the story portrays Andy is so diminishing to her character that she seems to regress instead of grow.
And, to close the circle, Emily. I don't have much to say except: why? Why bring her back only to give her the silliest storyline? She's the surprise villain of the story, yet everything is undone by the screenplay when the ending comes around and suddenly all is forgiven and forgotten. Emily is probably the standout character from the first movie. She's mean and haughty, yet so interesting and funny thanks to Emily Blunt's unforgettable portrayal, but here she's just an empty shell. She wants to steal Runway from Miranda — the same plot point from the previous movie, by the way — thanks to her useless millionaire boyfriend, then her plan doesn't work out and... it's all good and forgotten. Andy and she go out for lunch and are now friends. The end. Once again, I don't understand.
I do get the appeal of bringing such an iconic IP back and repackaging it for a new demographic. I mean, the box-office numbers are through the roof, so it clearly worked. But in terms of the quality of this movie, we're certainly not there. The fashion is there, the soundtrack is there, the cameos are there — actually, some of the characters feel more like cameos themselves, as the story doesn't really utilise them at all — but the magic? Definitely not there for me.

And one last thing that really, really bothered me was the three main couples. At least to me, none of the pairings works here. Miranda has a new, useless husband. Kenneth Branagh's talent is so underutilised here that it's shameful. Emily's millionaire (billionaire?) boyfriend, played by Justin Theroux, is useless and only serves the plot when needed. And don't even get me started on Andy's love interest, the Australian construction worker... why is he in the movie at all? Why does Andy need a new boyfriend at all, especially after the terrible one she already had in the previous movie? That is beyond me. All three couples are so ill-fitted and such a waste of the actors' talent.
All in all, "The Devil Wears Prada 2" is another sequel we didn't ask for and really didn't need. It's a pity that such an iconic piece of pop culture ended up becoming another cash-grab opportunity for Disney. I think this franchise deserved better. I don't know if I'll ever force myself to watch this movie again and maybe my opinion will change or soften with time — it happened with the first "Sex and the City" movie, at least — but for now it was a clear disappointment.
Film 204 - Il diavolo veste Prada
Film 741 - Il diavolo veste Prada
Film 2120 - The Devil Wears Prada
Film 2467 - The Devil Wears Prada 2
Cast: Meryl Streep, Anne Hathaway, Emily Blunt, Justin Theroux, Kenneth Branagh, Stanley Tucci, Lucy Liu, B. J. Novak, Simone Ashley, Tracie Thoms, Patrick Brammall, Rachel Bloom.
Box Office: $676.3 million (to this day)
Worth a watch?: I'm not sure being a fan of the original is enough to enjoy this second outing. I had low expectations and still I was disappointed. Maybe you'll find some comfort in seeing these characters on screen once again, I'm not sure. I just didn't vibe with the whole project and the overall movie experience. It felt like a cash-grab to me and I didn't appreciate it.
Awards: /
Key word: Holy Grail.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2466 - Bring Her Back

Intro: I remember watching the trailer and thinking I really wanted to see this movie. Then I never actually got around to it when it was out in theaters. So, one evening when my twink boy was at mine, we decided to give it a go.

Film 2466: "Bring Her Back" (2025), Danny Philippou, Michael Philippou
Watched: From the computer
Language: English
Watched with: Bill
Thoughts: I surely enjoyed it, but I wouldn't say I'd watch it again anytime soon. Reality is, I had big expectations for this one because it was Danny and Michael Philippou's follow-up movie (and only their second overall) after the unexpectedly good "Talk to Me". I say unexpectedly only because I knew nothing about that film and watched it on a whim, not because no one expected it to be good, mind you. Anyway, with this one I definitely had expectations, which we all know what that means. "Bring Her Back" is a decent horror story supported by an amazing Sally Hawkins performance. I would say she carries the whole movie herself, but that wouldn't be entirely true, as her younger co-stars are quite good as well. Sora Wong and Billy Barratt work well off each other, and you'd believe they're actually step-siblings; Jonah Wren Phillips undergoes a physical transformation for the ages, and at such a young age the visual result is absolutely impressive. What I would consider the weakest link of "Bring Her Back" is the plot. It delivers the conventional horror scares, but the mystery behind it all is fairly easy to figure out by the midpoint. From then on, the story lost me a little, in the sense that I was more interested in seeing whether my theories were correct than actually following along and enjoying the movie. I think if you've seen a fair share of horror movies before, it's not too difficult to figure out what's cooking before the screenplay decides to tell you. I understand it's hard nowadays to deliver a truly original story—especially in the horror genre—so I wasn't too bothered by it, but I remember thinking about it while watching the film, and that feeling has stayed with me since. Especially now that I've seen "Obsession" twice and "Backrooms", two of the most successful horror movies of all time, both of which came out almost back-to-back. And with "Weapons" and "Sinners" making such a splash last year, both culturally and at the Oscars, it's impossible not to keep that in mind when checking out other horror films.
Cast: Billy Barratt, Sora Wong, Jonah Wren Phillips, Sally Hawkins.
Box Office: $39.1 million
Worth a watch?: Solid enough, but not the most original horror movie I've seen recently. If you liked "Talk to Me", give this one a go..
Awards: /
Key word: Grapefruit.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2465 - Lee Cronin's The Mummy

Intro: God love a movie about ancient Egypt, pyramids, mummies and old curses. So when I heard about this film - from an Irish director, nonetheless! - I couldn't wait to go to the movies to see it!

Film 2465: "Lee Cronin's The Mummy" (2026), Lee Cronin
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh
Thoughts: Ok, let's be honest here: I didn't have big expectations for this one. I mean, I do have a fascination with ancient Egypt, I always have, so stories like this one are always a go for me. That said, I have to admit that, given the production budget ($22 million), the lack of star power (Jack Reynor is really the only recognizable face for English-speaking audiences) and the very demure marketing approach, I was expecting "Lee Cronin's The Mummy" to be an absolute abomination of a movie. And don't get me wrong, it isn't great, but it's also better than I expected, which genuinely surprised me.
First of all, the scope of the story is surprisingly big: we start in Egypt - first Aswan, then Cairo - before moving to Albuquerque, New Mexico. We move around, we chase some people, we relocate... and none of the locations ever feel cheap. It's not just an ugly green screen and a fake background. So I was quite impressed. Additionally, the visual effects aren't too bad and really help convey the story and its visual elements, especially when it comes to the little girl turning into the mummy (no spoilers here, it's literally on the movie's poster). I mean, you can tell they had to keep an eye on the budget, because some elements of the story are simply told to the audience rather than shown, but I understand the limitations and respect the effort. With what they had, they did a great job.
But I was mostly impressed with Lee Cronin. I have no idea who this man is, but he managed to:

• Put his name on the poster before the title of the movie in true horror style - I mean, I'm sure it was mainly because of trademark reasons, but hey, it is what it is.
• Secure funding for this crazy story about a cursed girl who turns into a mummy, possesses her siblings and, together, they desecrate their grandmother's corpse. Not the easiest pitch to sell to a studio.
• Produce this movie on a decent budget, put it out there and even open to $13.5 million and #3 at the American box office!

I mean, good for him! He had a vision and stood by it, and I respect that. Again, the movie isn't a masterpiece, but after considering all of the above, I have to admit that the whole operation behind "Lee Cronin's The Mummy" leaves a different impression. More than that, I'm glad that so many original stories are making their way to the big screen lately, and this is just another example of a (moderately) successful original IP that serves its purpose: telling a new story, entertaining its audience and providing a good time. And a good time I had.
Cast: Jack Reynor, Laia Costa, May Calamawy, Natalie Grace, Verónica Falcón, Hayat Kamille.
Box Office: $90 million
Worth a watch?: I've seen better movies, but I've also definitely seen worse. The story works well enough up until the end, when the whole ritual just sort of happens and you're not quite sure how or why. But I mean, do we really need to know? No. You can perfectly enjoy the crazy ride that is "Lee Cronin's The Mummy" and move on with your life without any problem.
Awards: /
Key word: Nectarine.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2464 - The Drama

Intro: TThe buzz around this movie was impossible to miss: an A24 production with Zendaya & Robert Pattinson (on their first movie collaboration of many upcoming ones in 2026), an interesting concept, a marketing campaign for the ages and, cherry on top, good reviews. We couldn't miss it.

Film 2464: "The Drama" (2026), Kristoffer Borgli
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh, Debbi
Thoughts: I wasn't sure what to expect with this one. I can't say I was completely won over by it, but I definitely found it interesting, and I appreciate how it sparked a conversation and a media frenzy around the story's main topic, as well as how well Alana Haim played her character. I'll say it straight away: I liked "The Drama". I think Zendaya and Pattinson are perfect scene partners and deliver amazing performances, the screenplay is well written - really funny at times, surreal at others - and overall this is a very interesting ride. The dramatic aspects of the story definitely land, although I wish the film had focused on more than just one subject. I won't spoil anything; suffice it to say that the dramatic core of the story stems from a revelation made by Zendaya's character at the beginning of the movie. From there, chaos slowly builds until the day of the wedding, where everything culminates in madness. I'm not mad at the fact that the dramatics promised by the title of the movie - and the posters and trailers - are ultimately tied to only one element of the story, I just wish they had delivered a bit more. Because of how the marketing campaign was handled, I imagined shenanigans happening left and right, some sort of trainwreck unfolding in slow motion as the wedding date approached. Instead, although shenanigans do happen, they all stem from one thing and one thing only. And look, that's OK, but after a while I have to admit I got a bit tired of how the story kept bringing this revealed secret back up without having the characters really acknowledge it until the very end of the movie. It could have been cool to use it as the perfect dramatic engine to kick the story off and then eventually move on to other shocking revelations or events so that the story would keep progressing and become more chaotic each time. Instead, we spend the whole movie focused on one topic, and the screenplay chooses to explore how all the characters react and interact after the secret has been exposed. As I said, I'm not mad about it; it's all handled in a way that works for the story. I just think a different approach would have worked better for me. That said, while the two main leads are perfectly matched for their roles, I think Alana Haim is really the scene-stealer here. Her performance as Rachel is so good that you can't help but hate her. I was really impressed by her portrayal. All in all, "The Drama" definitely delivered enough dramatics to be entertaining and refreshingly good. The story could have pushed things even further, but I appreciate how the movie manages to start a conversation around a tough topic in a way that shows both depth and a clear point of view, while being satirical and serious at the same time.
Cast: Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, Alana Haim, Mamoudou Athie, Hailey Benton Gates, Zoë Winters.
Box Office: $130.8 million
Worth a watch?: Its vibe reminded me of another A24 film that came out last year, "The Materialist", though obviously the two stories are different. If you enjoyed that one - or if you appreciate A24 movies in general - definitely give this one a watch. Zendaya and Robert Pattinson once again prove their star power and why they are two of the most interesting actors working in Hollywood today.
Awards: /
Key word: Worst thing.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2463 - Ready or Not 2: Here I Come

Intro: I watched the first one because I was so curious to catch the sequel in theaters, so the moment I had an opportunity to go, off I went.

Film 2463: "Ready or Not 2: Here I Come" (2026), Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Tyler Gillett
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh
Thoughts: One of the best cinematic surprises of the year so far. Not in my wildest dreams would I have thought that the sequel to a relatively low-budget movie from 7 years ago—a film that had a good run but didn't necessarily make waves in pop culture—would turn out to be not only better than the original, but also THIS good. The cast is iconic, the story is extremely inventive, and it expands the lore in a way that pays homage to the source material while taking it to a whole new dimension. Overall, "Ready or Not 2: Here I Come" is such a wildly chaotic cinematic experience that—if you enjoy this genre—it's impossible not to have a good time. I have to admit that I particularly appreciated watching these two "Ready or Not" movies almost back to back, as I don't think I would have remembered much from the first movie had I not watched it just before catching its sequel at the cinema. Because of this, I was able to enjoy some of the references and callbacks from "Ready or Not" that I wouldn't have gotten otherwise. I'm notoriously bad at remembering things. Samara Weaving is once again perfect for the role. She has a sort of fearless-but-pissed-off look that makes her character, Grace, so iconic. This time she's joined in the fight by her estranged sister, played by Kathryn Newton, while on the other side of the story, not one but two iconic actors enjoying a resurgence in popularity join the cast: Sarah Michelle Gellar and Elijah Wood. I think those two alone are reason enough to give this franchise—and this film specifically—a chance. All in all, "Ready or Not 2: Here I Come" is a breath of fresh air in a storytelling landscape that seems to be slowly moving toward more innovative and creative ideas, leaving at least some of the superhero blockbuster franchise fatigue behind. The shift was already in the air, but it's now even more obvious thanks to movies like this one and other recent unexpected hits such as "Obsession", "Backrooms", "The Drama", and "Send Help". It's an exciting moment for cinema, and it feels like we're finally moving beyond existing and established IPs to embrace original ideas and concepts that make the movie landscape feel interesting once again.
Film 2461 - Ready or Not
Film 2463 - Ready or Not 2: Here I Come
Cast: Samara Weaving, Kathryn Newton, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Shawn Hatosy, David Cronenberg, Néstor Carbonell, Kevin Durand, Elijah Wood.
Box Office: $42.8 million
Worth a watch?: If you liked the first one, this sequel will blow your mind. I had the best time and was amazed by how much the scope of this franchise has expanded, and by how perfectly all the elements of the story come together. The result is a satisfying and remarkably well-executed film. This franchise really surprised me!
Awards: /
Key word: Rules.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi