Film 2495 - The Invite

Intro: There was good buzz around this film and I was really curious to see for myself if it was worth the watch.

Film 2495: "The Invite" (2025), directed by Olivia Wilde
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh, Debbi
Thoughts: "The Invite" is a very interesting film, especially in the current cinematic landscape. And it's even more interesting that it managed to become so successful, considering I would consider this quite the niche film rather than a mainstream one. Instead, it managed to do well at the box office (on a $15 million production budget) and gather Oscar buzz this early in the year.
What caught my attention the most is how intimate this movie feels, to the point that I thought its story was taken from a play. There are only four characters, basically just one location we never get to escape, a dialogue-heavy script, and themes that are mainly ordinary and close to what would be any adult's life nowadays. Instead, this is actually the English-language remake of the 2020 Spanish film "Sentimental" by Cesc Gay.
Because of its theatrical vibe and remake essence, this film inherently reminds me of these other two: "Carnage" -- based on the play "Le Dieu du carnage" by Yasmina Reza -- and "Perfetti sconosciuti" -- in 2024 recognised as the most remade film by Guinness World Records, with productions in 24 different languages.
All three of these movies share similar qualities and themes: the confined space, limited characters and a story that revolves around couples, their relationships, struggles and secrets. Additionally, they all share a very specific tone: the story starts slowly in what would be an everyday life situation and gradually (and brutally) escalates, eventually peaking in some sort of explosive truth that shakes the couples to their core.
In this specific instance, "The Invite" leans more towards comedy than drama, which I appreciated. I especially enjoyed this because I don't think many would have expected Olivia Wilde and Penélope Cruz to be such a perfect fit for a story like this. To me, they are the true stars -- I can't call them revelations, as we all know how amazing and talented these ladies are -- of this film. It's true I'm drawn to strong female characters, but here I think they really outshine their male counterparts. Don't get me wrong, both Seth Rogen and Edward Norton do a great job, but I think the ladies really ate their parts. The sexual tension Cruz is able to bring to life between her and literally any other character is insane, and I never would have expected to see her in such a sexually charged role. On the other hand, Wilde portrays her character with such tension. There's a nervousness about her, an uneasiness that makes you feel the same way while you watch the story unfold. It's nerve-wracking, but it serves the character so well, especially opposite Cruz.
On top of a great performance, Wilde also directed the movie. This is not her first endeavour, but possibly her best one so far. I always find it commendable when a director succeeds in finding a way to tell a story that is spatially limited to a sole location. It would be so easy for the story to fail and for it to be visually presented in such a boring way that it would turn the audience away. Instead, Wilde's vision is extremely aware of the spaces and camera angles and never shies away from the actors' faces, keeping you constantly (and emotionally) engaged.
Overall, I really enjoyed "The Invite". I think it's a refreshing example of how smaller movies can feel big and engaging and entertain the hell out of you.
Cast: Seth Rogen, Olivia Wilde, Penélope Cruz, Edward Norton.
Box Office: $55.6 million
Worth a watch?: I really liked it. The actors are perfectly cast, the story is interesting and has enough crazy twists to keep you entertained and engaged. It's the perfect movie for a movie night that doesn't require bombastic entertainment, but rather something more adult-themed (there's a lot of sex talk indeed). If you liked "Carnage" or "Perfetti sconosciuti" (here's my personal deep dive on this unexpected Italian sensation), you can't miss this film.
Awards: /
Key word: Sex party.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2494 - Predator: Badlands

Intro: I didn't get the chance to see this film when it came out later last year and, to be honest, I kinda forgot about it. Then, a couple of months ago, somehow I remembered its existence and decided to give it a go.

Film 2494: "Predator: Badlands" (2025), directed by Dan Trachtenberg
Watched: On the computer
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: I've never been a massive "Predator" fan, but I've watched enough entries in the franchise to be able to say that I really like the new direction they're going for. And it's mainly thanks to Dan Trachtenberg, who directed both this film and "Prey", the previous one from 2022.
What I enjoy the most about these movies is that the character of Predator is the main focus of the story in a way that's unconventional for the genre. Other franchises like "Alien", "Halloween" or "A Nightmare on Elm Street" have the bad guy - or alien, in this case - simply being the main antagonist. There's not much character development, and they are usually not what the story focuses on, but rather a mechanism that serves the plot and scares the viewer. But not here.
"Prey" before and "Predator: Badlands" now put the title character at the center of their plot. Here especially, we get to spend time with what traditionally would have been the villain of the story: Predator has to prove to its dad that he can hunt the apex predator and, to do that, it travels to a different planet and sets the story into motion. It's such a refreshing perspective!
Not only this, but the movie is actually good. Considering how few characters the story puts together and the limitations of having your lead not speak any human language, it's quite impressive how the screenplay is able to smoothly move things forward in an engaging and cinematic way. I especially like how many visual cues are used to progress the plot - the spit thing above anything else for me - and how much world-building has gone into creating this film. And it all plays out well in the end, because the film is engaging, visually interesting and never boring. For a standalone product like this, the world and character creation is quite impressive.
If I had to find something negative to say, Elle Fanning's character could be the weak link for me. Not because she's not good in the film, but mainly because her character does most of the talking - sometimes it could be a bit much - and because Fanning plays two roles here and, although it's understandable why, it would have been nice to have seen another human face.
All in all, I really enjoyed "Predator: Badlands" and, together with its predecessor, I think it's an impressive entry in the world of this franchise.
Film 2134 - Prey
Film 2494 - Predator: Badlands
Film 1707 - The Predator
Cast: Elle Fanning, Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi, Reuben de Jong, Mike Homik, Alison Wright.
Box Office: $184.6 million
Worth a watch?: If you liked "Prey", you'll definitely like this one! It's unfortunate this film didn't make enough of a splash at the box office to spawn more movies -- although the animated anthology film "Predator: Killer of Killers" was released on Hulu/Disney+ in June last year, just before "Badlands" hit theaters in November.
It's a good sci-fi film that takes the franchise in a new direction that is both refreshing and entertaining. Watch it and you'll see.
Awards: /
Key word: Spit.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2493 - Fear Street: Prom Queen

Intro: I was looking to extend the horror movie streak a bit longer, but had no idea what to watch. So I turned to Netflix, hoping its catalogue would save me. And, for the purpose of what I was looking for, it did.

Film 2493: "Fear Street: Prom Queen" (2025), directed by Matt Palmer
Watched: On the computer
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: When I was a kid, I was a huge fan of R. L. Stine's "Goosebumps". I had most of the books, I read them constantly - even re-read one or two a bunch of times - and it was such a beloved franchise to me. So when I was scanning through Netflix's catalogue looking for something horror-related to spook up my evening, finding out that "Fear Street: Prom Queen" was based on the work of the same author was 100% the decisive factor. And sure, it wasn't mind-blowing, but I had enough of a decent time.
I'll be completely honest: this is not a good movie, but there's a certain vibe to it that I resonated with: the nostalgia. I love the 80s and I love horror movies, so the two elements combined definitely worked for me. But - and it's a big but - the acting isn't great, the plot twist at the end is a weak payoff for all the mystery set up throughout the plot, and overall "Fear Street: Prom Queen" feels more like - you guessed it - a Netflix production than an actual movie that would hit theaters and justify its existence by having something to say rather than simply filling out the catalogue.
I was happy to see Katherine Waterston again, though, and Lili Taylor is always guaranteed to deliver in the horror genre.
Cast: India Fowler, Suzanna Son, Fina Strazza, Chris Klein, David Iacono, Ella Rubin, Ariana Greenblatt, Lili Taylor, Katherine Waterston.
Box Office: /
Worth a watch?: I wouldn't necessarily recommend it, but if you're looking for something silly and easy to watch that falls under the horror umbrella, then go for it and see if it sticks. I think the original "Fear Street" is so much better, but the 80s prom night vibe could be a turn-on for some(one like me).
Awards: /
Key word: Winning.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2492 - Meg 2: The Trench

Intro: Once I heard it was bad, I never convinced myself to go and see it at the movies. Then, a few weeks ago, I saw it listed on Netflix and I said to myself: "Why not?"

Film 2492: "Meg 2: The Trench" (2023), directed by Ben Wheatley
Watched: On the computer
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: I mean, if you've seen the previous one, you know exactly what to expect from this sequel. And look, I'm not saying it's good by any means, but if you enjoyed "The Meg", you should have a good time this time around as well. And I did.
I think they tried to go even bigger with this one, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but the story ends up having way too many plots and subplots, and way too many main and side characters for the audience to be fully invested. To be fair, if you're watching "Meg 2: The Trench", you're doing it for the spectacle it provides and definitely not for the plot, but still, it's worth mentioning the overstuffed script.
And, as is to be expected, Jason Statham goes above and beyond to prove how badass he can be.
Not much else to say, really; either you have a good time or you think this is the stupidest movie in the world.
Film 1700 - The Meg
Film 2492 - Meg 2: The Trench
Cast: Jason Statham, Wu Jing, Sophia Cai, Page Kennedy, Sergio Peris-Mencheta, Skyler Samuels, Cliff Curtis.
Box Office: $398.5 million
Worth a watch?: "A research team's journey into the depths of the ocean turns into chaos when a mining operation forces them into a battle for survival, facing off against Megalodons and relentless environmental marauders." (from IMDb). If this sounds like your jam, damn, you're gonna have a good time. Otherwise, venture elsewhere.
Awards: 3 nominations at the Razzie Awards for Worst Picture, Worst Director and Worst Actor (Jason Statham).
Key word: Rare-earth minerals.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2491 - Fall

Intro: I was aware of this movie, but it never crossed my mind to watch it. Then recently I came across this film again and said to myself, why did I never watch it? It had all the elements that I would enjoy, so one evening I decided to give it a go.

Film 2491: "Fall" (2022), Scott Mann
Watched: From the computer
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: I'll admit I was expecting a bit more, but overall I enjoyed "Fall".
A few elements stood out to me:

- Conceiving an engaging story that is set in one tiny, confined location for 2/3 of its runtime is quite impressive.
- The 610-meter-high television broadcasting tower shown here - which I thought was ridiculously tall to actually be real - is based on the real 625-meter-high KXTV/KOVR tower in Walnut Grove, California, United States. Once I realized a similar structure actually exists, my perception of this movie and its believability radically shifted.
- The height element is the real driving force of this story. Whether you're afraid of heights or not, it's undeniable that this movie is able to capitalize on this visual element to produce a continuous adrenaline boost that runs throughout the story. Without it, "Fall" wouldn't be as effective or have much else that would make it stand out. Remove the broadcasting tower and this is just another survival story, as we've seen many times before portrayed on the big screen.

All of this said, the downside is that the big plot twist at the end isn't as creative as the rest of the story. I mean, I didn't necessarily see it coming, yet it felt like a cheap twist timed to give the main character one last challenge to face.
And speaking of challenges - although I understand that the particular setting of the story made it, in a way, necessary - I thought the script gave its main protagonists way too many obstacles to overcome. The constant twists and turns the story pulls out get more and more frustrating as time goes by. I often found myself wondering: "And now what?" Obviously, it shouldn't be too easy to get rescued from the tower or there would be no story to tell, but the way the story persists in presenting new life-threatening or emotionally stressful plot points (the shoe, the drone, the flare gun, the injuries, the vulture, the cheating) compromised the overall enjoyment of this film for me. Not totally, as I still had a good time overall, but I wish there were fewer twists so that the story would feel less packed and flow slightly better.
Ps. A sequel, "Fall 2: Deadpoint", is coming out this September.
Cast: Grace Caroline Currey, Virginia Gardner, Mason Gooding, Jeffrey Dean Morgan.
Box Office: $21.8 million
Worth a watch?: If you're scared of heights, this is either the film that will get you over it or send you over the edge. I could barely handle it, to be honest, but I enjoyed how much "Fall" had me on the edge of my seat. Up to you to decide if you're up to the task.
Awards: /
Key word: 1-4-3.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2490 - Ghost Ship

Intro: Over at Simon's we were looking for a movie to watch after (my first) taco dinner. Somehow, I remembered this movie existed and we just went for it.

Film 2490: "Ghost Ship" (2002), Steve Beck
Watched: From the computer
Language: English
Watched with: Simon
Thoughts: I mean, certainly not a masterpiece, but "Ghost Ship" is fun enough to be entertaining for what it is.
The horror elements of the story aren't new and you can see them coming a mile away, but this movie has more of a vibe that stays with you rather than a compelling story no one has ever told before.
Specifically, I feel the set pieces are quite good considering the $20 million budget and the fact that this film was never meant to become a box office juggernaut. So the fact that so much thought and care was put into crafting visually interesting sets and visuals - including some camera angles and shots - really surprised me. I mean, I'd seen this movie before ages ago and certainly didn't remember this aspect of it.
The one thing I remembered, though, is the fact that Francesca Rettondini is in it. I'm sure she acted in other Italian projects before and after this, but to me she's always been the partner of Alberto Castagna, a very famous Italian TV presenter who was big in the 90s. The fact that Rettondini somehow landed this (mute) role is so fascinating and legit the one memory of "Ghost Ship" that stayed with me over the years.

And there is another element here that is connected to Italy: the disappeared ocean liner at the center of the story is, in fact, Italian. Therefore, a lot of design elements (signs) and even a song are technically in my native language. Why the 'technically'? Because they're either spelled wrong or pronounced incorrectly which, to me, added a fun element to the whole experience.
Like, for example, in the picture here, you can read 'Cabina di capitano', which should be 'Cabina del capitano' instead. It's just... funny.
All in all, "Ghost Ship" is fine enough to be enjoyable. The premise of the disappeared ship that might contain a golden treasure is intriguing, the cast is quite packed with extremely familiar faces, the scary bits are predictable but work, and the bloody opening sequence is actually quite impressive and a good way to start the story with terror and disgust.
So yeah, I had a good time rewatching this.
Cast: Julianna Margulies, Ron Eldard, Desmond Harrington, Isaiah Washington, Karl Urban, Emily Browning, Francesca Rettondini, Gabriel Byrne.
Box Office: $68.3 million
Worth a watch?: It's not a must-watch, but it has its moments, especially the opening sequence. I'd say, if you're curious, go for it.
Awards: /
Key word: Gold.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2489 - Tre uomini e una gamba

Intro: I don't know why or what caused it, really, but all of a sudden I felt like I really wanted to rewatch this Italian movie. When it came out, I was 10 and I think I remember going to the movies to watch it with my parents. So it's possibly a combination of nostalgia for this movie, missing my parents and/or Italy. I guess...

Film 2489: "Tre uomini e una gamba" (1997), Aldo, Giovanni & Giacomo, Massimo Venier
Watched: From the computer
Language: Italian
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: Man, I really didn't remember much about this film. Like, it was almost like watching it for the first time all over again. And honestly, I had a blast.
It's hard to explain to non-Italian speakers the appeal of Aldo, Giovanni & Giacomo. They're super funny here, but it doesn't look like they're doing much, really. It's a mix of physical comedy, the juxtaposition of Northern and Southern habits and ways of life and, in this specific movie, the sketches. The latter, especially, are an interesting choice: they don't progress the story - if anything, they pause it - and yet they're possibly the funniest comedy bits here. Obviously, this was a clever way to include and acknowledge the trio's background in improv and theater, and these short stories within the actual main story are when the three comedians really shine the most. I didn't realize this until I rewatched "Tre uomini e una gamba", but most of the bits I remembered from the movie actually come from the sketches: Dracula, the 'cadrega', and Ajeje Brazorf are all small pieces of Italian pop culture from that time that I carry with me to this day, and I was so surprised to realize that I had completely forgotten they belonged to this film.
Needless to say, I quite enjoyed this watch. It's reminiscent of a specific time and place that reminds me of my childhood and offers a fast track to nostalgia, in a way that's hard to describe. I look at this movie in a way that isn't just from the perspective of the story it tells, but also (mainly?) what it reminds me of and what it means to me.
I really do find "Tre uomini e una gamba" to be extremely funny and probably Aldo, Giovanni & Giacomo's best movie to date. It's naive and simple, yet effective because of how straightforward the story is: the trio embarks on a journey to the South of Italy to get to Gallipoli in time for Aldo's wedding. On the road, adventures and misadventures happen and, of course, someone falls in love unexpectedly. It's just that, yet it's effective and heartwarming in a way that (Italian) comedy isn't capable of being anymore.
Cast: Aldo Baglio, Giovanni Storti, Giacomo Poretti, Marina Massironi, Carlo Croccolo, Luciana Littizzetto, Maria Pia Casilio, Augusto Zucchi, Mohamed El Sayed.
Box Office: €33.6 million
Worth a watch?: "Tre uomini e una gamba" is basically a time machine: if you're curious to see how we used to be and live in Italy back in the day, this is definitely one of the comedies I would recommend. And, if you end up enjoying it, other similar films to consider could be (from the same trio) "Così è la vita" and "Chiedimi se sono felice", Leonardo Pieraccioni's "Il ciclone", or Carlo Verdone's "Viaggi di nozze".
Awards: Nominated for Best New Director (Migliore Regista Esordiente) at the David di Donatello 1998.
Key word: Garpez.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2488 - Masters of the Universe

Intro: I wasn't planning to watch this one, to be fair, but the reviews were better than I expected, and I got intrigued...

Film 2488: "Masters of the Universe" (2026), Travis Knight
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: I didn't know much about He-Man. I can vaguely recall watching the cartoon as a child, but if this movie hadn't come out, I probably wouldn't even have remembered the character. Which, in theory, could be a good thing, as "Masters of the Universe" could be the perfect re-introduction to this world. But I'm not 100% sure this film taught me much.
It's been a month since I saw it in theaters, and I have to admit I don't remember much about the story or the characters. It all blended into a mixture of vague memories from this film and possibly other similar ones. I'm thinking of pretty much any superhero origin story from the last decade or so. What I do remember, though, is thinking while watching it that, yeah, "Masters of the Universe" isn't bad, but it also isn't that great either. It's a fun ride for what it is, but compared to other movies that suffered a similar fate*, such as "Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves", this one doesn't really have anything that sets it apart. Or maybe it's just me? I'm not sure. I haven't watched many superhero films lately, as I'm currently a bit done with the genre, so it's entirely possible that I checked out a bit while watching.
Other things I remember thinking at the movies:

• I'm not sure Nicholas Galitzine works in this role for me. I only know him from "Bottoms", "Red, White & Royal Blue", and "The Sheep Detectives", and he's clearly talented. Yet I couldn't stop thinking that he's the gay guy from the Amazon Prime gay movie. That's all I could think about.
• Camila Mendes' makeup department choices were... questionable. The colored contact lenses look fake, and her hair color is clearly not her real one. I'm not sure if that was a wig, but it definitely took me out of the movie every time she was on screen.
• The villain. I know that Hollywood keeps thinking that Jared Leto** is this gifted actor who's able to bring in crowds of fans, but a) that was never really the case (go watch "House of Gucci" if you think otherwise), and b) I really don't see the point of casting him here, considering his character, Skeletor, is fully CGI and even the voice is modified. It literally could have been anybody else playing Skeletor, and you wouldn't be able to tell.
• I do believe "Masters of the Universe" came out at the wrong time and is too similar to previous Marvel movies, especially the later "Thor" films. They share a similar Viking-from-another-world vibe, as well as the same tone and humor, which people have been complaining about for a while now.
• Lastly, I don't think the marketing pushed this IP enough or made it interesting enough for people to care. I don't even remember seeing the trailer before going to see the actual movie.

I want to reiterate that "Masters of the Universe" is not a bad movie at all. I was hoping for something a bit more original in terms of tone and vibe, yes, but overall the film is enjoyable. I just didn't connect with it all that much.

* Actually good movies that didn't perform well at the box office, or at least not well enough to justify a sequel or a further expansion of the franchise.

**Jared Leto is currently in deep shit after being accused of sexual misconduct and criminal sexual conduct by four different women. This is the last time I'm acknowledging him on this blog, as from now on I'm only going to list him in the cast section of any film I'm reviewing (that is, if I'm going to see a movie with him in it anymore).

Cast: Nicholas Galitzine, Camila Mendes, Alison Brie, James Purefoy, Morena Baccarin, Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson, Kristen Wiig, Jared Leto, Idris Elba.
Box Office: $114 million
Worth a watch?: A catastrophic flop at the box office - it cost $170 million just to produce - "Masters of the Universe" is good enough for an evening in front of the TV, when your only desire is to turn your brain off and possibly indulge in a little bit of nostalgia.
Awards: /
Key word: "I have the power!".
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2487 - Neighbors

Intro: Second evening in Dingle, second movie from the couch. After a night out in town, of course.

Film 2487: "Neighbors" (2014), Nicholas Stoller
Watched: From the TV
Language: English
Watched with: Debbi, Niamh, Eimear
Thoughts: I've watched this movie a bunch of times already and always find it funny. It's not a masterpiece or anything, but it's almost like a comfort watch that, at the right time, delivers exactly what I need. Similar to other films like "21 Jump Street", "22 Jump Street" or "We're the Millers".
So I guess the vibe was once again right for me, as I really enjoyed rewatching this first "Neighbors" - the sequel isn't that good - after so many years since I last saw it.
I think Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne have great chemistry together, and watching the two of them go up against the other screen duo, Zac Efron and Dave Franco, is a pleasure. My personal highlights: the airbag and milking scenes. Hilarious.
All in all, a solid comedy that still works more than 10 years later. And these days, that's quite the feat.
Film 773 - Cattivi vicini
Film 1060 - Cattivi vicini
Film 2487 - Neighbors
Film 1192 - Cattivi vicini 2
Cast: Zac Efron, Rose Byrne, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Dave Franco, Ike Barinholtz, Carla Gallo, Lisa Kudrow.
Box Office: $270.7 million
Worth a watch?: It's the type of comedy that isn't for everybody, I understand that, but if you enjoy a less refined humor that goes all in on the politically incorrect, this is the movie for you. This one. Again, not the second one.
Awards: 3 wins at the MTV Movie + TV Awards Best Shirtless Performance (Zac Efron), Best Duo (Zac Efron, Dave Franco), and Best WTF Moment (Seth Rogen, Rose Byrne) over 7 nominations (Best Comedic Performance for Rose Byrne, Best Musical Moment, Best Kiss, Best Fight).
Key word: Police.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2486 - Office Romance

Intro: Back in June, we spent a weekend in Dingle, Co. Kerry, to celebrate Niamh's birthday and, while there, we watched a couple of movies. This is the first one.

Film 2486: "Office Romance" (2026), Ol Parker
Watched: From the TV
Language: English
Watched with: Debbi, Niamh, Eimear
Thoughts: I quite like romcoms, so this should be right up my alley, but I wasn't really sure I wanted to watch this one. Mainly for a couple of reasons: both Jennifer Lopez's and Netflix's movies aren't usually that good. So, combine the two elements together and you get why I wasn't feeling too excited about "Office Romance". The saving grace of the project is Brett Goldstein - who also wrote the script - one of my favourite actors from the "Ted Lasso" family. Because of him playing the lead, I was kinda intrigued.
I'll be honest, "Office Romance" is quite the odd movie. Lopez and Goldstein have nice chemistry and the romance is believable enough, I'll give them that. Overall, I guess the story is fine, but it definitely takes some strange turns: the birth scene is unnecessarily graphic, the British kink room is weirder than romantic, and the sister (Jodie Whittaker) plot twist is surprisingly serious for a movie like this. This last element especially felt the oddest to me because it doesn't really fit the vibe, even more so when the story tries to make the situation somehow funny by making her some sort of comic relief. It's not; she's in prison - if I recall correctly, she murdered someone? - and if you choose to include this dark element in your romcom, you should treat it in a more appropriate way. Or at least that's how I felt while watching the movie.
Overall, I appreciate the effort to deliver a film that is less your usual romantic comedy and a bit more of an oddball that catches you by surprise at times, but I'm not sure it's done in a completely successful way here. Also, in the more demanding emotional scenes - like the last one at the press conference - JLo still cannot deliver.
Cast: Jennifer Lopez, Brett Goldstein, Betty Gilpin, Amy Sedaris, Tony Hale, Bradley Whitford, Edward James Olmos, Jodie Whittaker.
Box Office: /
Worth a watch?: Of all the romcoms you can watch, I wouldn't have this one at the top of my list. It's fine, the production value is obvious, and Brett Goldstein surprisingly works for a project like this, but overall the story is emotionally inconsistent and feels stranger than it should at times.
Awards: /
Key word: Lawsuit.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2485 - Disclosure Day

Intro: Not that I was dying to see this film... but when Steven Spielberg has a new one out, you can't really miss it, or what kind of cinema fanatic are you really?!

Film 2485: "Disclosure Day" (2026), Steven Spielberg
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: Oh boy.
I wasn't expecting this movie to be groundbreaking or a masterpiece, but I certainly didn't anticipate just how bored I'd be while watching it. I went by myself, so I was very much focused and present, and I definitely struggled to stay awake during some scenes. Especially at the beginning, when no one really knows what's going on, the story takes so long to actually get going that you begin to wonder what the point of it all really is. And, to be fair, that question still stands.
What I mean is that "Disclosure Day" doesn't seem to know what kind of movie it'd like to be, as it combines so many different elements from different genres: thriller, alien invasion, mystery, action, espionage, sci-fi, and... religious?! The mix is at times so random that it's really hard to take the story seriously. I appreciate the effort to go for something different and not just the seen-it-before alien invasion bit, but I'm not sure venturing into religious territory was the right choice (I'm referring to the moment where Emily Blunt's character reads one person's mind and says something along the lines of, "I don't want to be your religion." I legitimately laughed at that scene).
It's not just this, though. The alien aspect was quite disappointing in the end. Especially the big reveal where Blunt and the alien talk... I don't know, it really ruined the ending for me. I thought there was no need to show the alien, story-wise, and the visual effects really don't deliver. The end result just looks cheap and unconvincing. Speaking of visual effects, I also don't think they were very good throughout the whole film. For a movie that cost $115 million to make—and God knows how much to promote—the end result isn't up to par. The animals, especially, don't look believable and, look, nobody went to the cinema expecting this one to deliver a realistic take on possible human-alien contact, but the overall lack of believability takes you out of the story at times.
Last but not least, I think the story is way too overcrowded. Not just with different narrative elements or plot points, but with characters as well. Too many story arcs to complete, too many side stories we don't really care about. Rarely have I seen a character so obviously utilized as a plot tool as the boyfriend, played by Wyatt Russell: remove him from the story and literally nothing changes.
Anyway, I don't want to only shit on this movie, so here's a short list of the elements I appreciated:

• Emily Blunt as a leading lady. I love her. She's clearly talented and can carry a movie on her shoulders with no problem. Her face does look strange, though.
• Steven Spielberg is still a great director. The car chase scene was really good.
• I'm glad to see Josh O'Connor making a splash in Hollywood. He's handsome and so talented, and hopefully he'll stop queerbaiting us in allegedly gay movie romances and either go all in or stop edging us.
• The newsroom setting was interesting, although underdeveloped. I wish they'd explored that a bit more rather than all the government nonsense and the boyfriend crap.

All in all, "Disclosure Day" was unfortunately worse than I expected. Maybe a shorter, less crowded edit of this story would have worked better. And there was no need to show us the aliens: once you materialize on screen the one element your story has asked the audience to imagine, the fantasy is ruined.
Cast: Emily Blunt, Josh O'Connor, Colin Firth, Eve Hewson, Wyatt Russell, Elizabeth Marvel, Colman Domingo.
Box Office: $239.8 million
Worth a watch?: For Spielberg fans. It's not awful, but it is a confused story filled with too many elements that weaken the overall message. One of the biggest disappointments of 2026 for me.
Awards: /
Key word: Cardinal.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2484 - Mortal Kombat II

Intro: When I was in Italy back in May, I rewatched the first film in this series to get ready for the sequel. Then, when I got back, I missed my chance to go to the movies - to watch "The Sheep Detectives", of all movies... - and didn't get to see it. So, as soon as the right moment presented itself, I gave this film a go.

Film 2484: "Mortal Kombat II" (2026), Simon McQuoid
Watched: From the projector
Language: English
Watched with: No one
Thoughts: To my surprise, I actually quite enjoyed the first "Mortal Kombat" and was extremely curious to see its sequel. I read reasonably good things about it, but nothing too enthusiastic, and the box office performance wasn't stellar, so I didn't know what to expect.
Fact is, I loved this movie! I think, even more so than the first one, it's great at delivering a story that's closer to its source material: we finally see the tournament happen, the players go against each other and die, and all their best moves are performed on the big screen in an environment that makes sense for what this product is: a film based on a fighting video game.
I was particularly impressed by the visual aesthetic of the film. All the settings for the fight scenes are great and feel very unique while, color-wise, I thought "Mortal Kombat II" does a great job of highlighting the different factions, worlds, costumes and elements that uniquely identify each character, in a way that doesn't feel like a simple copy-paste from the game.
Additionally, I think this sequel shows that the producers actually listened to what the audience asked for after the first film came out: the tournament, the fights, and the lore of the source material, rather than just fan service. And I believe the story does a great job of incorporating all these elements together.
That said, "Mortal Kombat II" has its flaws, although I wasn't too bothered by them. I personally struggled with the number of characters the story deals with, to the point that at times I couldn't keep up. Also, some of the characters from the previous film were just there to get slaughtered which, yeah, you could see coming from a mile away, but I thought it was bold in some cases. (spoiler) Particularly, bringing back Cole Young (Lewis Tan), aka the main protagonist of the previous film, only to have him massacred the first time he competes in the tournament was a bold move. It really surprised me and, yeah, I loved it. He was a terrible protagonist, so I think it was a good move to shift the focus to the more charismatic and entertaining Johnny Cage (Karl Urban).
All in all, I really enjoyed "Mortal Kombat II" and I can't wait to watch it again. I only wish this movie had gotten a bit more love at the box office to justify a third outing. At this stage, I'm not sure it's gonna happen, but I have my fingers crossed.
Film 2014 - Mortal Kombat
Film 2469 - Mortal Kombat
Film 2484 - Mortal Kombat II
Cast: Karl Urban, Adeline Rudolph, Jessica McNamee, Josh Lawson, Ludi Lin, Mehcad Brooks, Tati Gabrielle, Lewis Tan, Damon Herriman, Chin Han, Tadanobu Asano, Joe Taslim, Hiroyuki Sanada.
Box Office: $129.5 million
Worth a watch?: If you enjoyed the first one, I'm sure you're gonna love this sequel even more. The story is tighter, the action sequences are amazing and, in general, "Mortal Kombat II" is better paced, has found the right protagonist and is a clear improvement over the first film. I found it visually compelling, and the soundtrack is a banger. Currently, I'm obsessed with the end credits song. I highly recommend it if you enjoy club/techno music (Techno Syndrome 2026 (feat. Ed Boon) - Olivier Adams).
Awards: /
Key word: Amulet.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2483 - Obsession

Intro: Still pretty much obsessed. One last time.

Film 2483: "Obsession" (2025), Curry Barker
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Steven
Thoughts: For a moment there, it felt like I was only going to the movies to watch "Obsession" and, yeah, it was kinda like that.
On my third watch, I have to admit that I still enjoyed this movie quite a lot. It didn't matter that I knew all the scary bits and where the story would go; this film felt fresh every time I watched it, which is an accomplishment in itself.
Pair that with an astonishing box office performance ($475 million worldwide on a budget of $750,000), Curry Barker's filmmaking career skyrocketing, and Inde Navarrette's and Michael Johnston's performances putting them on Hollywood's radar... You can't deny that "Obsession" is the movie surprise of the year.
Obviously I'm a huge horror film fan, so this movie was clearly my cup of tea to begin with, but the success behind this piece of media doesn't just rely on horror fans. The script is genius precisely because it isn't overly complicated compared to other similar outings in the genre: there's an enchanted object, a wish that leads to a curse, and protagonists who have to deal with the consequences. It's that simple, yet so effective. And the nuances this story presents are quite interesting and disturbing, possibly more so than the horror element itself: Nikki (Navarrette) is stripped of her agency and forced into a romantic relationship whether she likes it or not. Bear (Johnston) is shy and timid at the beginning, only to reveal his true colors as the story progresses and the abuse escalates. And he's not willing to stop. If anything, he's resentful that Nikki still won't love him back. It's tragic and terrifying at the same time.
So yeah, I do love this film. I think it's a great example of the heights the horror genre can reach when it's done right and, right now, "Obsession" is still my favourite movie of 2026.
Film 2472 - Obsession
Film 2478 - Obsession
Film 2483 - Obsession
Cast: Michael Johnston, Inde Navarrette, Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless, Andy Richter.
Box Office: $475 million
Worth a watch?: There is already Oscar buzz for this one, particularly for the Best Actress and Screenplay categories. Will these predictions come to fruition? It's way too early to say, but as the current movie landscape stands, there's clearly a chance (especially after last year's Best Supporting Actress Oscar win for "Weapons"). In the meantime, if for whatever crazy reason you still haven't seen "Obsession", do yourself a favour and go see it. I rest my case.
Awards: /
Key word: Cat.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2482 - Miss Congeniality

Intro: I didn't get the chance to write anything new over the past few days because I was hospitalised a week ago. There's (still) an issue with my eyes - I constantly see double, they call it diplopia apparently - and the doctors cannot figure out what's causing it. It's getting much better - I can even write here! - but it still tires me out to look at a screen for too long, and it takes a lot of energy to focus on typing and reading, so I'm taking it easy for now.

Film 2482: "Miss Congeniality" (2000), Donald Petrie
Watched: On the projector
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh
Thoughts: Originally, we watched this movie to get ready for the Babes Awards - an award show my friends and I organise to give ourselves crazy titles like 'Drama Queen', 'Sporty Babe' or 'Best Couple' - because Niamh and I wanted to perform the famous opening number from the Miss United States beauty pageant featured here. Like, let's be real for a moment: "One in a Million" is a banger!
So, our plan was to study the choreography they do here and replicate it as the opening number for the 2026 Babes Awards. Reality is, there was just too much going on, our energy levels were low, and we ended up scrapping the idea in favour of something simpler: a picture and video collection of our friend group from previous years, set to the UK Traitors theme song. And that one, too, is another banger.
To be fair though, after watching "Hokum", going for something brighter and lighter in tone was definitely the right call. Not to mention that "Miss Congeniality" is just a damn good movie. It's a feel-good story, it's well told and imaginative, and it's genuinely funny. I wish they still made this kind of movie, where the premise is simple but effective, the story is fully fleshed out, and the cast is filled with true A-listers from both the present and the past. I mean, it's mind-blowing to think that "Miss Congeniality" brought together Sandra Bullock, Michael Caine, Candice Bergen, and William Shatner in the same film.
The sequel isn't nearly as good, but this one's iconic.
Film 1432 - Miss Congeniality
Film 2482 - Miss Congeniality
Cast: Sandra Bullock, Michael Caine, Benjamin Bratt, Candice Bergen, William Shatner, Ernie Hudson, Heather Burns.
Box Office: $212.7 million
Worth a watch?: I love romcoms from this era; there's something about them that I really miss and cherish. Back when this came out, "Miss Congeniality" was considered a chick flick, a lesser movie compared to other, more "worthy" films. The reality is that, 26 years later, it's not only a comfort watch, but it's also still genuinely good and incredibly entertaining. If you haven't watched it yet, it's time to give it a go!
Awards: 2 Golden Globe nominations for Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture - Comedy or Musical (Sandra Bullock) and Best Original Song - Motion Picture ("One in a Million").
Key word: Crown.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2481 - Hokum

Intro: Niamh came over for dinner a few weeks ago and we decided to give this movie a go after we missed it at the cinema. The renaissance of the horror genre continues!

Film 2481: "Hokum" (2026), Damian McCarthy
Watched: On the projector
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh
Thoughts: It's not the most innovative horror film ever made and I agree with Niamh when she pointed out that they should have shown more of the witch, but overall I enjoyed "Hokum" more than I expected. To the point that a couple of jump scares actually worked on me.
I obviously resonated with the Irish setting of the story, having lived in Dublin for the past six years. I think there is definitely a spooky element that comes from the gloominess of the environment, both natural and manmade. The hotel, in particular, is such a strange combination of 'comfortable unfriendliness': there's everything you could think of for a comfortable stay, yet it doesn't feel natural or genuine. Instead, it ends up feeling more like a mix of clashing styles that doesn't really make sense and doesn't feel too welcoming. In addition to the environment, the characters are pretty shady themselves and that adds to the overall strange vibe of The Bilberry Woods Hotel.
"Hokum" also reminded me a lot of the hotel episode of "Widow's Bay": there's a supernatural force and we're stuck indoors, in the dark, trying to understand if the scary legends are real or not and whether the place is haunted. Additionally, the witch was giving me "Winchester" vibes and the Irish folklore elements of the story made me think of "The Watchers".
So, as I said, there are definitely many aspects of this film that don't feel new or innovative, but "Hokum" does a good job of delivering a solid horror film, perfectly carried by Adam Scott's cranky performance as the protagonist, Ohm. I also appreciated that the supporting characters actually had something to do with the overall plot and were not just casualties put there to be slaughtered by the 'evil force'. For a horror movie, the screenplay definitely takes its time to flesh the characters out and make sure they're an integral part of the story.
One thing I really didn't enjoy, though, was the beginning/ending part: it's disjointed from the rest of the story and doesn't add anything to it, and for me it really didn't work. The movie starts and ends in such a different tone from the rest of what you're shown that it's hard to wrap your head around it. I think it worked better on paper than it actually does on screen.
Cast: Adam Scott, Peter Coonan, David Wilmot, Florence Ordesh, Michael Patric, Will O'Connell, Brendan Conroy, Austin Amelio.
Box Office: $24.1 million
Worth a watch?: It's not gonna blow your mind, but it's an honest horror film and it does its job. There are slightly more storylines than there needed to be, but the scary moments and Adam Scott's performance are good reasons enough to give Damian McCarthy's movie a go.
Awards: /
Key word: Dumbwaiter.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi