Film 2476 - Backrooms

Intro: Extremely excited to see this movie, we timed it perfectly so that Jake—whether he wanted to or not—ended up coming with us. It was his first time at the movies in years, so I was happy to be the one who brought him back.

Film 2476: "Backrooms" (2026), Kane Parsons
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Jake, Niamh, Debbi
Thoughts: What a time to be a horror fan!
Within the span of a couple of weeks, "Obsession" and this film have taken the box office by storm, brought people back to the theater, smashed record after record, and created such a cultural phenomenon that we haven't seen in a while. Not of Barbenheimer proportions, but quite impressive still. Keep all of this in mind when I say: I had big expectations for this one.
Pumped up by my "Obsession" fever, ecstatic because of the massive opening weekend gross in the US ($81.5 million! The movie cost $10 million to produce!), and excited about this horror abundance, I didn't necessarily know what to expect, but I was really hoping that "Backrooms" could deliver. And, well, it did. And it didn't. Let me explain.
I want to start by saying I don't know anything about the lore behind this story. I didn't know Kane Parsons or his web series, I didn't know what creepypasta meant—I still don't, if I'm being honest. So I went into this just hoping for a good time. Which I did have, for the most part.
The premise is this: Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor) owns a furniture store. His life is falling apart: he's an alcoholic, he's getting divorced, and the business is failing. For this reason, he moves into the store. One night, he notices the lights flickering mysteriously in the basement and, when he goes to check the breaker box, there's a glowing slit in a wall. When Clark approaches it, he falls through and enters the Backrooms. And what are the Backrooms? (From Wiki:) A labyrinthine extradimensional space containing a chaotic expanse of dull yellow rooms, fluorescent lights, long corridors, and malformed furniture.
So the story starts really strong: the mystery is intriguing and the screenplay does a great job of giving you enough details to understand what's going on while avoiding giving too much away, so that the second part of the movie doesn't get ruined. Amazing. The issues, though, start with the second part of the movie.
The more the screenplay tries to explain itself and its lore, the more things start to get complicated and harder to understand. Or maybe I just lost interest, I don't know. I was initially extremely invested, but once Clark's therapist (Renate Reinsve) enters the Backrooms herself and the big mystery behind the monster is revealed... things really take an odd turn, and the big reveal is so meh that I found it almost lazy, if I'm being honest. I don't want to give too much away, but I don't understand how the monster was created. And what's its meaning in the story? I don't get what it's supposed to symbolize, considering the first thing it does after we see it on screen for the first time is kill its creator.
Another thing that I found confusing is why the Async Research Institute plotline is so underutilized. The movie opens with a scientist from this project being killed by the monster: was the monster the same one that is later revealed, or was it a different one? Because it seemed to me that Clark doesn't enter the Backrooms until after the scientist has been killed, so how could the monster be that monster, if you know what I mean (I'm trying so hard to avoid spoilers and name names not to give anything away). And, anyway, why don't we get more details about this research institute? Maybe they're going to use it in the already announced sequel, but so far it's absolutely unclear to me what is going on with the science people and why they're there.
So yeah, a lot of confusion that kind of ruined the well-built first half of the movie. The tension and uncertainty I experienced at the beginning of the story quickly disappeared once the monster was finally revealed, and for the rest of the movie I struggled to follow and grasp what was going on. I'm not saying this is necessarily bad: it could be that all of this gets fixed in the sequel and we get all the explanations and details we lack here. I highly doubt it, but it's possible.
Based on the information I have now, though, I have to admit that "Backrooms" was a bit of a letdown: a great starting point and build-up, but the plot twist and ending didn't deliver for me.
All in all, I did enjoy "Backrooms" as a collective cinematic experience: the theater was full, and it was nice, for once, to be in sync with the current pop-cultural discourse (usually I'm always late to the game). On top of that, Chiwetel Ejiofor's and Renate Reinsve's performances are extremely good so, if not for the plot, I appreciated this movie for their committed, convincing performances.
Cast: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Renate Reinsve, Mark Duplass, Finn Bennett, Lukita Maxwell.
Box Office: $350 million (as of today)
Worth a watch?: Is it my favourite horror movie? No, but it's still a solid one. I think "Backrooms'" problem is that its premise is so good and intriguing that it's hard to write a whole story that can keep the hype and mystery as high. So yeah, the plot twist isn't my favourite, but overall this movie is a good watch and a fascinating one: the whole liminal-space aesthetic, malformed furniture, and insane spaces all come together to create such a distinct cinematic experience that it's hard to describe unless you see it. So give it a go and see it for yourself. You might enjoy it more than I did.
Awards: /
Key word: Mascot.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2475 - I Saw the TV Glow

Intro: I heard great things about this film and wanted to check it for myself. So on the way back from Fuerteventura earlier this year I started watching it and, unfortunately, I stopped almost immediately. Back then it was mainly because there isn't a lot of dialogue here and the plane was so loud I could barely follow what was going on. In retrospect, it might have been a sign...

Film 2475: "I Saw the TV Glow" (2024), Jane Schoenbrun
Watched: From the projector
Language: English
Watched with: Jake
Thoughts: Possibly my least favourite film I've seen recently. I'm sure "I Saw the TV Glow" has its fans out there, but this is definitely not my cup of tea.
My main issue with this movie is its pace, and a little bit the outlandish plot (especially towards the end).
Specifically, it's evident from the get-go that the screenplay is in no rush to let you know what's going on: the pace is slow, the dialogue is minimal, the soundtrack takes the lead, things happen and yet it feels like nothing is going on. I would describe it as one of those stories where vibes and aesthetic vision take over the plot to deliver a product that is more in the range of a long music video or something that would be shown at an art gallery as a visual piece from an artist. That's how I felt watching it — together with frustration.
Yes, frustration, because "I Saw the TV Glow" was sold to me as an indie masterpiece and a psychological horror drama, so my expectations were high and connected to a specific movie genre. So I was definitely disappointed when a) I wasn't particularly taken by the story while watching it and b) I realized there was no conventional horror element in the story whatsoever. And it definitely didn't help that Jake and I were making fun of some bits of the story while watching it: the amount of time they repeat "The Pink Opaque" in the fucking dialogues is insane and drove me crazy.
All in all, this movie wasn't what I expected it to be (and probably needed to see that evening, if I'm being honest) and ended up not enjoying it at all. Justice Smith and Jack Haven's performances are good but didn't blow me away, while Jane Schoenbrun's artistic vision is clear and consistent throughout the whole story, but it's so prominent that it ends up outshining the script. They have a new movie coming out soon that looks promising ("Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma" with none other than Gillian Anderson and Hannah Einbinder) and I'm probably gonna watch it, but I'm afraid I'll end up feeling the same way I felt watching this film: having bought into the promising trailer and enthusiastic reviews only to find it didn't live up to the hype.
P.S. I don't want to deadname anyone, but for the sake of clarity, I just want to point out that Jack Haven here is credited as Brigette Lundy-Paine.
Cast: Justice Smith, Jack Haven, Helena Howard, Lindsey Jordan, Conner O'Malley, Emma Portner, Ian Foreman, Fred Durst, Danielle Deadwyler.
Box Office: $5.4 million
Worth a watch?: The obsession for a TV show pushes two high school friends to question their reality when the show starts to feel more real than their own lives at times. This idea is quite intriguing and I was curious to see where the screenplay would have led this story, but I have to admit that I really struggled to stay focused the more the plot developed and progressed.
It's a very slow-paced film that relies heavily on aesthetics and vibes: if this is what you're looking for in a film, go for it, I'm sure you'll have a great time. For those who enjoy a more structured and dialogue-heavy story, this might not be your cup of tea.
Awards: Presented in the Panorama section at the 74th Berlin International Film Festival.
Key word: The Pink Opaque.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2466 - Bring Her Back

Intro: I remember watching the trailer and thinking I really wanted to see this movie. Then I never actually got around to it when it was out in theaters. So, one evening when my twink boy was at mine, we decided to give it a go.

Film 2466: "Bring Her Back" (2025), Danny Philippou, Michael Philippou
Watched: From the computer
Language: English
Watched with: Bill
Thoughts: I surely enjoyed it, but I wouldn't say I'd watch it again anytime soon. Reality is, I had big expectations for this one because it was Danny and Michael Philippou's follow-up movie (and only their second overall) after the unexpectedly good "Talk to Me". I say unexpectedly only because I knew nothing about that film and watched it on a whim, not because no one expected it to be good, mind you. Anyway, with this one I definitely had expectations, which we all know what that means. "Bring Her Back" is a decent horror story supported by an amazing Sally Hawkins performance. I would say she carries the whole movie herself, but that wouldn't be entirely true, as her younger co-stars are quite good as well. Sora Wong and Billy Barratt work well off each other, and you'd believe they're actually step-siblings; Jonah Wren Phillips undergoes a physical transformation for the ages, and at such a young age the visual result is absolutely impressive. What I would consider the weakest link of "Bring Her Back" is the plot. It delivers the conventional horror scares, but the mystery behind it all is fairly easy to figure out by the midpoint. From then on, the story lost me a little, in the sense that I was more interested in seeing whether my theories were correct than actually following along and enjoying the movie. I think if you've seen a fair share of horror movies before, it's not too difficult to figure out what's cooking before the screenplay decides to tell you. I understand it's hard nowadays to deliver a truly original story—especially in the horror genre—so I wasn't too bothered by it, but I remember thinking about it while watching the film, and that feeling has stayed with me since. Especially now that I've seen "Obsession" twice and "Backrooms", two of the most successful horror movies of all time, both of which came out almost back-to-back. And with "Weapons" and "Sinners" making such a splash last year, both culturally and at the Oscars, it's impossible not to keep that in mind when checking out other horror films.
Cast: Billy Barratt, Sora Wong, Jonah Wren Phillips, Sally Hawkins.
Box Office: $39.1 million
Worth a watch?: Solid enough, but not the most original horror movie I've seen recently. If you liked "Talk to Me", give this one a go..
Awards: /
Key word: Grapefruit.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2464 - The Drama

Intro: TThe buzz around this movie was impossible to miss: an A24 production with Zendaya & Robert Pattinson (on their first movie collaboration of many upcoming ones in 2026), an interesting concept, a marketing campaign for the ages and, cherry on top, good reviews. We couldn't miss it.

Film 2464: "The Drama" (2026), Kristoffer Borgli
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh, Debbi
Thoughts: I wasn't sure what to expect with this one. I can't say I was completely won over by it, but I definitely found it interesting, and I appreciate how it sparked a conversation and a media frenzy around the story's main topic, as well as how well Alana Haim played her character. I'll say it straight away: I liked "The Drama". I think Zendaya and Pattinson are perfect scene partners and deliver amazing performances, the screenplay is well written - really funny at times, surreal at others - and overall this is a very interesting ride. The dramatic aspects of the story definitely land, although I wish the film had focused on more than just one subject. I won't spoil anything; suffice it to say that the dramatic core of the story stems from a revelation made by Zendaya's character at the beginning of the movie. From there, chaos slowly builds until the day of the wedding, where everything culminates in madness. I'm not mad at the fact that the dramatics promised by the title of the movie - and the posters and trailers - are ultimately tied to only one element of the story, I just wish they had delivered a bit more. Because of how the marketing campaign was handled, I imagined shenanigans happening left and right, some sort of trainwreck unfolding in slow motion as the wedding date approached. Instead, although shenanigans do happen, they all stem from one thing and one thing only. And look, that's OK, but after a while I have to admit I got a bit tired of how the story kept bringing this revealed secret back up without having the characters really acknowledge it until the very end of the movie. It could have been cool to use it as the perfect dramatic engine to kick the story off and then eventually move on to other shocking revelations or events so that the story would keep progressing and become more chaotic each time. Instead, we spend the whole movie focused on one topic, and the screenplay chooses to explore how all the characters react and interact after the secret has been exposed. As I said, I'm not mad about it; it's all handled in a way that works for the story. I just think a different approach would have worked better for me. That said, while the two main leads are perfectly matched for their roles, I think Alana Haim is really the scene-stealer here. Her performance as Rachel is so good that you can't help but hate her. I was really impressed by her portrayal. All in all, "The Drama" definitely delivered enough dramatics to be entertaining and refreshingly good. The story could have pushed things even further, but I appreciate how the movie manages to start a conversation around a tough topic in a way that shows both depth and a clear point of view, while being satirical and serious at the same time.
Cast: Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, Alana Haim, Mamoudou Athie, Hailey Benton Gates, Zoë Winters.
Box Office: $130.8 million
Worth a watch?: Its vibe reminded me of another A24 film that came out last year, "The Materialist", though obviously the two stories are different. If you enjoyed that one - or if you appreciate A24 movies in general - definitely give this one a watch. Zendaya and Robert Pattinson once again prove their star power and why they are two of the most interesting actors working in Hollywood today.
Awards: /
Key word: Worst thing.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2457 - Eternity

Intro: This was recommended to me by one of the girls I took the Screenwriting course with.

Film 2457: "Eternity" (2025), David Freyne
Watched: From my computer
Language: English
Watched with: Bill
Thoughts: I think this is one of those movies that sounds better on paper. I'm not saying "Eternity" is a bad movie or anything - I actually quite enjoyed it - but there's a clear limitation to its potential: once the main idea is revealed and the plot is in motion, there really isn't much else to talk about. Let me explain.
I'll start with the logline you can find on IMDb: "In an afterlife where souls have one week to decide where to spend eternity, Joan is faced with the impossible choice between the man she spent her life with and her first love, who died young and has waited decades for her to arrive." This perfectly sums up what you find in this movie, because honestly there isn't much else to it, which is exactly what I was referring to. The main idea is so powerful and interesting, but the movie barely explores any other topic beyond it. It's like there's an ocean of possible storylines, but the screenplay corners itself: there's a time constraint, there's a choice to be made, and there are only two options (technically three if Joan decided to leave both men behind). And that's the end of the road.
Although the movie explores many themes - loss, love, aspirations, memories - and is filled with a decent number of characters, the scope of the story remains tied to the love triangle and never really lets go until it gets resolved. Which happens at the end of the movie, obviously. So once that happens, we fade to black and go home. Which I found, in the grand scheme of things, acceptable, but also a waste of great potential. The afterlife feels like a two-dimensional carnival: a fun ride, but not much else beyond picking your ideal scenario and off you go for the rest of eternity. I don't know, I just hope the afterlife, if it exists, doesn't actually look like this one because it would stress the hell (see what I did there?) out of me. And considering you have all eternity ahead of you, and there's definitely no lack of space over there, I really don't see why people are required to make their choice within a week. That creative decision didn't really make sense to me, especially considering that once you pick your afterlife scenario, you can't change your mind. Forever. You're stuck there. Endless scenarios to choose from and you give me seven days?! Too intense for my little brain.
All of this said, I think "Eternity" is a beautifully crafted movie. Its aesthetics are quite pleasing and although the color correction is a bit too on the nose at times, I still appreciated how bright and vibrant the colors were.
Miles Teller, Elizabeth Olsen, and Callum Turner make for a very interesting trio: all great actors and all perfectly cast for their parts. I thought Turner's character was unbearable and his story arc is something you can guess from a mile away, but look, we all need a villain. It also has to be said that Da'Vine Joy Randolph steals the show. She's unforgettable - she has such presence and charisma that you can't take your eyes off her when she's on screen. Such a star!
All in all, I enjoyed "Eternity". It's an unconventional story, it balances comedic and dramatic moments well, and it's beautifully shot. God save stories that try something different!
Cast: Miles Teller, Elizabeth Olsen, Callum Turner, John Early, Olga Merediz, Betty Buckley, Da'Vine Joy Randolph.
Box Office: $35 million
Worth a watch?: I liked it, although I was hoping the scope of the story would be a bit broader. If you like A24 movies, this is another one you shouldn't miss.
Awards: /
Key word: Hair.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2446 - The Moment

Intro: Last Friday evening in Dublin before the two-week break in Fuerteventura, Spain. And we couldn't leave Ireland without going to the movies to catch this one!

Film 2446: "The Moment" (2026), Aidan Zamiri
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh, Debbi, Rachel
Thoughts: I famously hate extremely loud movies, but this one I didn't mind too much. It gave me anxiety, yes, but I still enjoyed the ride.
I think the main selling point for me is Charli XCX: she's very entertaining and surprisingly good here. I know she's playing herself, so obviously it's a bit easier than playing a character from scratch, but she comes across as genuine and authentic, not forced, still able to channel that "Brat" energy even though Brat Summer ended a while ago now. Which brings me to my next point.
"Brat" came out on June 7, 2024. Brat Summer was "over" in September 2024, but then it experienced a resurgence after Charli's 2025 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival performance. I went to see Charli perform here in Dublin on June 17, 2025, and Brat Summer was still very much alive. So my question is: why wait until the beginning of 2026 to release this movie in theaters?
"The Moment" and Emerald Fennell's "Wuthering Heights" came out at the same time and, from a marketing perspective, it's a strange move. This movie is clearly connected to the album "Brat": they share the same art style and visuals, and although this is a mockumentary that aims to make fun of Brat Summer and its cultural impact, it heavily features "Brat", the tour, Charli's life, and the media attention around her. On the other hand, "Wuthering Heights" is directly connected to Charli's subsequent eponymous soundtrack album that she created for the film. And with the release of the first singles from the album, "House" and "Chains of Love", it seemed clear that Charli had entered a new era—even if it's currently tied to a film (a new album is apparently on the way).
In this sense, A24's "The Moment" feels a little bit too late. It should have come out earlier to link it more directly to "Brat" and make better use of the cultural phenomenon that Brat Summer proved to be. I'm not surprised that this movie didn't make a big splash at the box office: not only it came out to leat, but also it's a mockumentary and it's tied to an artist who is hugely famous, yes, but not everyone's cup of tea. Not to mention that the beef with Taylor Swift might have had an impact on whether people decided to give this film a go or not.
Anyway, I enjoyed "The Moment" enough, although it wasn't what I expected. I found some moments funny—like when the whole tour starts very "Brat" and ends up becoming a sellout version of itself, or when Charli tries to pay with the Brat card but it doesn't actually work—and I appreciated how committed she was to this project. I didn't enjoy how stressed the story and editing made me feel, but I understand it's intentional, and I wish they had used more songs from "Brat", considering how heavily they seemed to rely on the album and Brat Summer in promoting this film.
Ps. A lot of cameos and famous people are featured here, have fun recognizing them all!
Pps. I'm including here Charli's portrait I did a while ago and posted on my Instagram account @the_moustached_designer

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Moustached Designer (@the_moustached_designer)

Cast: Charli XCX, Rosanna Arquette, Kate Berlant, Jamie Demetriou, Hailey Benton Gates, Isaac Powell, Kylie Jenner, Rachel Sennott, Arielle Dombasle, Julia Fox, Alexander Skarsgård.
Box Office: $5 million
Worth a watch?: Not a film I would necessarily rewatch, but I'm glad I saw it in the cinema rather than at home, because it's one of those movies that is better experienced on the big screen, with a proper Dolby Surround sound system. It's a whole experience, and it really overwhelms you at the beginning. The story captures Charli's mental state well, and the film translates it into images that affect you whether you want it to or not. Some bits are funny, others do a good job of highlighting how surreal the music business can be—how everything can be turned into money and what people are willing to do to please the crowd, reach a bigger audience, and stay culturally relevant. There's definitely a lot of good intentions in this movie, but maybe too many ideas for just one project.
Awards: /
Key word: Concert.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2424 - Pillion

Intro: It took me a while to get to this review. I had the template ready for about 10 days, but couldn’t find the time, energy, or just the willingness to sit down and write it. Yeah, the peak of award season just ended, but to be fair, it was mainly because this is the last movie I watched with Yegor before our breakup and, possibly, part of me wasn’t ready to let go.
The list of new movies to review is getting longer, though, so off we go.

Film 2424: "Pillion" (2025), Harry Lighton
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh, Debbi, Yegor
Thoughts: Not the gay romance I was expecting, "Pillion" was definitely an interesting watch. To me, BDSM, dom and sub—it’s all a world I don’t know much about, and it’s not a kink I have, so watching this movie was almost like analyzing a case study.
I think Alexander Skarsgård is perfectly cast and gives off the right vibe for his character, Ray. Harry Melling is a great protagonist and shows his potential here as a leading man, regardless of the genre, but I can’t deny it was a bit strange to see Harry Potter’s cousin’s ass on the big screen (Melling plays Dudley Dursley in the "Harry Potter" franchise). Anyway, the two together are the gay couple you didn’t know you needed. They make a great screen pair.
Overall, "Pillion" is bold and provocative and shines a light on a community that is rarely the subject of a movie (let alone one produced by the BBC). Not necessarily my gay romance fantasy, but I found it interesting and definitely refreshing.
Cast: Harry Melling, Alexander Skarsgård, Douglas Hodge, Lesley Sharp, Jake Shears.
Box Office: $5.9 million
Worth a watch?: "Pillion" isn't for everybody, but if it's premise interests you ("A directionless man is swept off his feet when an enigmatic, impossibly handsome biker takes him on as his submissive.", from IMDb), then it's definitely worth a watch.
Awards: 3 BAFTA nominations (Outstanding British Film, Outstanding British Debut, and Adapted Screenplay). The movie won Best Screenplay at the Cannes Film Festival 2025 in the Un Certain Regard section.
Key word: Day off.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2406 - Eddington

Intro: This was my last film at the movies before going on holiday to Corfu, Greece for two weeks. I wasn't necessarily thrilled to watch it, I'll be honest, but the reviews seemed good and the cast phenomenal. So... why not?

Film 2406: "Eddington" (2025), Ari Aster
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh, Debbi, Yegor
Thoughts: I wish Emma Stone would every now and again go back to some lighter entertainment, comedies or anyway something a bit less art house-wibe only. She's a great actress, one of the most talented out there, and we already know it. It's absolutely understandable she wants to challenge herself with new and different roles and I think that's commendable (and vital for her career). That said, I miss the time Stone would star in a movie that... is just a movie and not a statement or a piece of art. End of my rant (if rant can be called).
Did I like "Eddington"? Absolutely not. I find it extremely long and for the most part uneventful. The ending is tense and well executed, but it comes in too late to save the movie for me. A move that, by the way is two and a half hours long. Also, I've never been a big fan of western, to be fair.
So yeah, this film did not do it for me and although it features a crazy talented cast and shares the director of "Hereditary" and "Midsommar", it was a drag to watch and I couldn't engage with the story at all.
Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Pedro Pascal, Luke Grimes, Deirdre O'Connell, Micheal Ward, Clifton Collins Jr., Austin Butler, Emma Stone.
Box Office: $13.1 million
Worth a watch?: I'm sure "Eddington" has its fans, but this movie is just not for me (and it's way too long). Watch it if you're curious, love Ari Aster's work or enjoy any of the actors featured here.
Awards: /
Key word: Albuquerque.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2400 - Materialists

Intro: I think it's kinda funny - in a twisted way - that I finally get to write about this movie that I saw a while ago on a date night with Yegor, the day after we broke up.

Film 2400: "Materialists" (2025), Celine Song
Watched: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Yegor
Thoughts: I think this movie has a lot of potential, but I didn't necessarily loved it. The ending is bittersweet - we all knew about it, of course - and the fact that she gets back with her boyfriend is never a good storyline in my opinion, but "Materialists" explores a lot of interesting teams, and very current ones (the title gives it away from the get go, to be fair).
I know this is not a rom-com, we cannot really blame the story for turning into something less expected and exploring heavy themes, still it caught me a bit off guard. I appreciate that this film is more than just a fairytale with an happy ending and actually grounds itself in reality more than other outings in the genre, my issue was more with the tone and pace, although nothing is really wrong overall here.
Dakota Johnson delivers an honest performance and I think she really carries the whole movie. She doesn't have that 'grandeur' when acting, but with the right project she's absolutely able to shine. Both Chris Evans and Pedro Pascal are fine, but she really is the star of "Materialists".
Cast: Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans, Pedro Pascal, Zoë Winters, Louisa Jacobson.
Box Office: $108 million
Worth a watch?: Probably not the best movie to watch on a romantic date nor one to talk about the next day your relationship ended. It's not groundbreaking, but overall a good film.
Awards: /
Key word: Checking the boxes.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi

Film 2370 - Death of a Unicorn

Intro: I was really looking forward to watching this movie, especially in theaters. So we squeezed it in during our (back then) busy schedule and went to Cineworld.

Film 2370: "Death of a Unicorn" (2025), Alex Scharfman
Watched on: At the movies
Language: English
Watched with: Niamh
Thoughts: I have to be honest, I didn't particularly like this movie. I had high expectations because I was extremely excited to see Téa Leoni on the big screen again + the trailer seemed really good and "Death of a Unicorn" seemed to have all the card to be at least a good movie. Reality is, it's not great.
As a dark comedy, it's not really funny. It's definitely extravagant, I'll give it that, but other than that there's not much else. The cast is amazing, but not necessarily used to their best potential: Jenna Ortega is playing Jenna Ortega playing a pissed (borderline, at this point) teenager, Will Poulter tries to be the comedic relief and mostly succedes but not entirely, Téa Leoni is basically playing Rosamund Pike's character in "Saltburn" and Paul Rudd is good at doing himself/Ant-Man, but when it comes to other facial expressions... there's not a lot going on.
Top that with a story that doesn't deliver what you would expect - there's a million side characters that you don't really care about but they keep on being introduced and killed, but it doesn't add anything to the story and also it's not funny - and it's more odd than fantasy black comedy, then what you have left is a little bit of disappointment.
Again, the idea has potential, but the delivery didn't thrill me.
Cast: Paul Rudd, Jenna Ortega, Will Poulter, Anthony Carrigan, Téa Leoni, Richard E. Grant.
Box Office: $16.1 million
Worth a watch?: I thought it would have been more fun, to be honest. Good cast, Téa Leoni is back and we're happy about it, but "Death of a Unicorn" should have it harder to deliver and good overall result. It's not awaful by any means, but I was expecting more or something else, even.
Awards: /
Key word: Middle age.
Trailer
#HollywoodCiak
Bengi